Stephen Scharf wrote:
> Richard,
> I guess whether it's redundant is dependent on the user's
> perspective. Lightroom was specifically designed to
> dramatically speed up the workflow for professional
> photographers who must manage, cull selects, edit, and output
> (as either slideshows, prints or web images)
> potentially thousands of images/day. That is it's
> mission statement, so to speak. Adobe Bridge
> cannot (and was not designed to) handle serious
> numbers of RAW images/day, and although
> I have not used Olympus Viewer, I doubt it can, either.
Stephen,
Thanks for your informative response. Because of Ken's and your reply I
now have a better understanding of the purpose of Lightroom. I don't
see it fitting into my needs as I don't handle huge volumes of images a
day. If I had to handle that amount of volume I would probably need to
be hospitalized in a psychiatric ward after a short period of time due
to sensory overload. :)
Regards,
Richard L
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|