I didn't say it did. I just think you're taking unnecessary risks with
your valuable data when the alternative is so cheap and reliable.
But a microdrive problem will likely be a mechanical failure. What
you're dealing with appears to be a simple E-1 firmware bug. From the
description it sounds as though it was attempting to walk and chew gum
at the same time, something no DOS was ever able to do and it shouldn't
have attempted it.
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
>>Serves him right :-)
>>
>>>As Borat would say, "WHAT?!?!?" <insert sound of slamming
>>>brakes and screeching tires here>
>>>
>>>Jeez, d00d! DETAILS. DETAILS. DETAILS.
>
>
>
> Now hold on just a cotton-picken moment. What would a
> Microdrive (approved by Olympus BTW) have anything to do with
> it? The thing might be boat slow, but it's been great.
>
> Seems like the OS in the camera should be able to handle it just
> fine. I'd hate to think that the OS system is that sensitive to
> throughput rates. If so, I'm going to start rethinking my plans
> on going 100% digital.
>
> AG
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Sponsored Link
>
> Mortgage rates near 39yr lows.
> $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment!
> www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|