Subject: | [OM] Re: Introduction and OM-1 questions/4 |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:16:17 -0800 |
Bart Wientjes wrote: > This brings me to a related point I've been contemplating. > > It has been mentioned on the list recently (probably by John H.) that OM-10s > make good donor cameras for replacement prisms for OM-1s that are affected > by foam rot. > Should I conclude that --' though the OM-10 prisms are good -- OM-1 prisms > are more better suited for the job? Would it even be benificial for the > OM-2's viewfinder to put in an OM-1 prism? > The prisms in all the cameras you mention and the OM-G(OM-20) are all the identical part, no better or worse. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Introduction and OM-1 questions/4, Bart Wientjes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Introduction and OM-1 questions/4, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Introduction and OM-1 questions/4, Bart Wientjes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Introduction and OM-1 questions/4, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |