Marc Lawrence wrote:
>> keith_w wrote:
>> The body piercings are an immediate turn-off, but when you
>> get a good view of the repusive Goth slatherings, UCK! Wilt
>> time...
> Not at all for myself. Having partaken of some minor "body
> mutilation" myself, some only removed for eventual comfort
> reasons, I've always enjoyed well-thought-out nail-gunnings,
> and the Goths can be particularly "thoughtful" and good
> at selection and placement.
>
> Of course, for myself I wouldn't do anything below the
> wasteline, if not being "just* my anti-monarchy sentiments
> that make me averse to Prince Albert. ;-)
>
> The others, however, may return (as well as some already-
> chosen tat's).
>
> Johan, I very much like this shot:
>
> http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/ws_061111/PB114193.jpg
Why, because she looks so young, inexperienced and forlorn?
Hell, Marc, she's still a tail-waggin' puppy! <g>
keith
> and of the two initially posted, my preference is for the
> contrast, as well as the closeness and "initimacy" :-) , of
> the second.
>
> Cheers,
> Marc
> Sydney, Oz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
