Adding a little more ...
OT = off topic or non-Olympus, which for this seller is M*nolta
Also a 135/4.5 will sell for more than a 135/2.8 ;-)
-jeff
On 11/13/06, Timpe, Jim <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The 24/3.5 is a shift lens.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of keith_w
>
>
>
> Hi Piers,
>
> Can that be right?
> An f/3.5 selling for 10X more than an f/2.8?
> I bought my H.Zuiko 24/2.8 in June of this year for $138. NO chipped
> elements...
>
> I thought maybe a decimal point slipped somewhere!
>
> Oh wait a minute. You said "OT" mount. What's that? Or did you mean OM
> mount?
>
> keith whaley
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|