Thanks for the URL. First pictures by the camera I have seen.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:38 AM, David Irisarri wrote:
>
> Dear Winsor,
>
> Like E-XXX series, E-400 is alittle bit noisy in the shadows but I
> must say
> it will render very beautiful images at all ISO range. Have a look
> to this
> ISO 800 test image. It has been captured in JPG. I wonder how you
> could
> improve it with the newest RAW processing engines and noise reduction
> algorithms. E-400 will be a clear winer!!!
>
> ISO 800 test image: http://www.wrotniak.com/photo/oly-e/pp/
> p9150083.jpg
> Nice review: http://www.wrotniak.com/photo/oly-e/e400-fotopolis.html
>
> Kind regards,
>
> David Irisarri
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:55 PM
> Subject: [OM] E-400 Caution
>
>
>>
>> I know the E-400 looks to be very nice, but I would wait for a really
>> good review. The sensor sites on the 8MP 4/3 sensors and on the D2X
>> are about the same as is the noise. The pixel pitch of the E-400 is
>> 4.9 microns, the smallest by a significant bit of any DSLR. It is
>> likely to be fairly noisy at even moderately high ISO unless Olympus
>> has discovered something no one knows. Jumping out and buying one on
>> a spec sheet may set you up for disappointment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Winsor
>> Long Beach, California, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|