I had a 24/2.8 for many, many years and sold it in favor of an f/2
version, which I love. Some of the tests describe waveform distortion,
but I've never seen it in my example. I also love the super-bright
finder. The size/weight penalty isn't too great either.
Skip
swisspace wrote:
> I thought I wanted one of these as well, until I read a few
> reviews/tests and decided that the 24/2.8 might just be that bit
> better, might save you a bit of money if you don't need that extra stop.
> I think that this is one case where the f2 version doesn't outshine the
> f2.8 too much, but I haven't used the f2 version, no doubt others will
> be along soon to confirm or disagree :-)
>
> Andrew Wiese wrote:
>
>> Just a quick note - I know this isn't a sales board... I'm having some
>> trouble locating a 24/2 Zuiko - if anyone has one they are looking to move
>> or can point me in the right direction, I'd be glad to hear it. I thought I
>> had one sewn up, but the sale fell through.
>>
>> Thanks for any pointers or offers,
>>
>> A.
>>
>> andrew (at) photowiese.com
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|