I'm sure she'd look just as good at f/2.8 or f/4. Besides, who's
looking at the background.
Chuck Norcutt
David Irisarri wrote:
> But it was taken at f2!!!! ;-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:06 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: ZD 50mm f/2
>
>
>
>>I'll accept this as a test of the ZD 50/2
>><http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=2318>
>>
>>But she'd look good taken with any lens :-)
>><http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15525>
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>David Irisarri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Here are some examples of ZD 50/2 performance.
>>>http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15525
>>>http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=2318
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|