Actually, noise isn't a great issue with me either as I rarely shoot
over ISO 400 but do shoot a great deal at ISO 400 with flash. Most
important to me is fast, accurate autofocus in near dark conditions.
The 5D does that too and also does it way better than the 20D.
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
>
>>Yes, you're smoking rope but I don't think it's your eyes that
>>are deceiving you. Here are a few simple stats...
>
>
> Ok, I'm probably hallucinating a little, but honestly, when
> looking at the comparative 20D and 1DsM2 RAW files (I was given
> the originals to convert using my own methods) I wasn't overly
> impressed. This, however, is strictly dealing with noise. There
> are other aspects of the Canon images which were distinctly
> different--for example the AA filter in the E-1 is way too
> strong.
>
> I'm no longer defending the E-1. It's like trying to ride a
> unicycle in the Tour De France. The camera is great, the sensor
> is severely dated. But, honestly, noise has rarely been an
> issue to me.
>
> I don't think that sensor size is going to matter in another
> year or two. Pixel Bin'ing is coming--the ability to group
> multiple pixels together to represent a single pixel as well as
> "noise-mapping".
>
> AG
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|