Adaptall to OM and OM to EOS should work fine I think.
Chuck Norcutt
ScottGee1 wrote:
> That's why we voted to allow you to return! ;o)
>
> An Tamron adapter for EOS? Rara avis, that. I've had two. Sold one
> in a moment of weakness and had to buy a lens that included one to get
> the one I have now. Sold the lens separately.
>
> If memory serves, it might be easier to get an M42 adapter for the
> lens and the camera.
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 10/13/06, Jon Mitchell <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>As if on cue - I return !!
>>
>>And yes, I do have the Tamron 17mm. I haven't tried it yet on the e330,
>>but I will soon. I might also be able to try it on a mate's 20D if said
>>mate has a Tamron adaptor. No access to N*k*n, though.
>>
>>Jon
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
>>Behalf Of Piers Hemy
>>Sent: 13 October 2006 17:45
>>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [OM] Re: Digital lenses WAS: Re: E-500
>>
>>
>>I don't have the 17mm Tamron any more (but I think I know who does,
>>Jon?).
>>
>>I also don't have a D200 or any other N body.
>>
>>But I do have a couple of N Adaptall mounts should any body here be
>>willing
>>to confess they need one. Or two!
>>
>>USD20 shipped anywhere, Paypal, CC are fine. And I won't tell on you.
>>
>>Piers
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|