Subject: | [OM] Re: re Kodak !! |
---|---|
From: | David Carter <spotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:04:43 +1300 |
They definitely need to get their fertilizer together. I certainly wouldn't be keen on buying anything from them. Even if it was unobtanium elsewhere. Ali Shah wrote: > 8-)) Have you seen the feedback? Even some of the > shady camera shops out of NYC dont have feedback that > bad! > > > > > > > --- David Carter <spotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> An interesting sideline for Kodak? >> >> Item number: 270036649704 >> >> from you know where >> >> ============================================== >> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com >> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx >> ============================================== >> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: re Kodak !!, Ali Shah |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: re Kodak !!, ScottGee1 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: re Kodak !!, Ali Shah |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: re Kodak !!, ScottGee1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |