I am skeptical of that popular assertion. If you divide the pixel
count in one dimension by its physical size you get about double a
pretty good lens resolution. It seems to me you have to have enough
pixel redundancy to capture a 70 lpmm target, for example, no matter
where it falls. They are not always going to line up with the pixel
grid. Then you get aliasing and moiree. Then there is the high pass
diffusion filter. I think that all works against that notion.
The other argument against that assertion is that surely Canon would
see the prestige and marketing advantage of producing at least a
couple of lenses that would exploit their sensor fully leaving
everyone else further in the dust, if the assertion were true.
There does seem to be consensus, where I have been looking, that a
high count sensor will sort out the good lenses from the bad ones
though.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> At least one Canonite who has been lusting after Zuiko 18, 21 and 24mm
> lenses and other brands besides Canon says that even the best of the
> best can't resolve the full 16MP all the way across the frame.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|