Subject: | [OM] Re: is a long post okay?; snide crackers |
---|---|
From: | keith_w <keith_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Oct 2006 07:20:52 -0700 |
William Sommerwerck wrote: > I'd like to post the letter I sent to Olympus tearing apart the E-500 and > FL-36 documentation. But it's long, running to six printed pages. Should I > send it two pages at a time -- or not send it at all? To what end? I vote no. keith whaley ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Super Tak 50mm F1.4 vs Zuiko 50mm F1.4, keith_w |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: is a long post okay?; snide crackers, Walt Wayman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] is a long post okay?; snide crackers, William Sommerwerck |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: is a long post okay?; snide crackers, Jón Ragnarsson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |