* On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:02:36PM -0400, Chuck Norcutt said:
> I meant it would have been a great shot if it had been a little sharper.
> I do like the composition a lot. It's also possible that it's not
> focus but a little motion blur. The rapid loss of sharpness due to
> depth of field effects is fine but the eyes, nose, mouth and whiskers
> should be critically sharp and they are not.
Thanks for the feedback here, and I do agree with you completely. I think
it probably was as much motion blur as anything else, I was down around
1/30th at this point. The depth of field wasn't really an intenional
desire to be perfectly honest. While I usually like it shallow, here it
was because of the light.
Had it been a bit brighter I'd have had it a stop or two higher, but sadly
this wasn't to be.
And yes, I find it hard to look at after a while myself. :)
p.
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ "Bother!" said Pooh, as he drank
/,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ his fifth Pan Galactic Gargle
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' Blaster.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|