*Sigh* I must agree. When I followed the link, I deliberately didn't look to
see which shot was which, and I immediately picked the Provia scan as being the
superior photo. It just has more of that "being there" look. I don't know how
else to explain it.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Manuel Viet <oly@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> I disagree ; when I look at both pictures, clearly the digital one looks to
> me
> flatter than the film one. In fact, I agree that when you just look at
> details, both are equivalent, but when you look at the full frame, the film
> image gives a better sense of volumes : the EDS letters, the ribs on the
> white blob, they're all much better looking on film. This is a feeling that's
> not resolution related, obviously.
>
--snip--
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|