I'll take a look at it, maybe fiddle with Lightroom while it's still
Beta, and write to Apple too :)
On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> Just because it is .orf it does not mean it is the same. Otherwise
> you would not have to wait for an update to Aperture, Adobe Camera
> Raw, or whatever when you buy a camera that has just come out.
> Sometimes it is just a tag in the code identifying it, but it still
> stops it from working. You may have to look for a less expensive raw
> converter that has been around for a while for those files. Maybe
> MacBibble?
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 8:03 PM, iddibhai@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyone have any luck using Apple's Aperture w/ RAW files from an
>> E10 (or
>> E20)? I know it's not in the officially supported list of cameras,
>> but the
>> rest of the E series put out .ORF, as do the E10/20...so what gives?
>> They'll import, and preview will show, albiet distorted, and
>> otherwise
>> says "unsupported file format". Please tell me there's a
>> workaround, I
>> just got a Macbook and Aperture, and would be severely
>> disappointed if
>> they won't accept E10 RAW (even if the laptop and software "work"
>> machines).
>>
>> --
>> aim:iddibhai | icq:104079359 | msn:msidd004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ludic & sardonic photoblog: http://iddibhai.blogspot.com
>> dum spiro, spero
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|