Reminds me of some of the silly stuff practiced in the judiciary. A certified
copy of a document is simply a photocopy with a stamp and certificate from the
court clerk attesting to its authenticity. These are always sufficient within
the state where they originate, but sometimes what's called an "exemplified
copy" is required by some states before they will honor a copy from a foreign
state.
Which brings us to whether or not Chuck and Ali are really who they claim to
be. A document is exemplified by having, in addition to the normal
certification, an affidavit from a judge stating that the clerk is the clerk
and an affidavit from the clerk stating that the judge is the judge. How is
this any different from the Chuck/Ali conundrum? Has anyone ever seen the two
together? Suspicious minds want to know! :-)
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Of course! Ali can vouch for me. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
> (fading into obvlivion as his memory goes by the way side)
>
>
> AG Schnozz wrote:
>
> > --- Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> >
> >>I can vouch that Ali is very real.
> >
> >
> > Ah! But is Chuck Norcutt real?
> >
> > AG-not real-Schnozz
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|