I don't think I've shot any film since the Oly Ody shots but I would
definitely use the Kodak UC 100 again. The single roll I had was a gift
from someone cleaning out film odds and ends from their fridge. I was
especially impressed by the nicely saturated blue sky with no polarizer
involved.
Chuck Norcutt
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Don't know if it's still relevant---have used and scanned UC 100 and
> 400. They have a consistent look, though the 400 was a bit of a
> stretch as far as resolution for macro. I think Chuck used the Kod
> 100UC for his nice Oly Ody shots. On a recent trip with heavy
> overcast after heavy overcast days tried a 400 HD roll from my
> sister-in-law who uses an IS-5. I had it processed at my usual
> fairly competent lab. Results: ugh. Some shots were passable in
> moderately bright light, but then why bother. Just my 2c. Mike
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|