Subject: | [OM] Re: The Pentax K10D |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:47:09 -0400 |
You're adjectives are under rating the AF system's low light capabilities. The 10D was very decent. The 20D was a signficant improvement. Now the 5D is as much an improvement over the 20D as the 20D was over the 10D. In the dark, the camera sees much better than I do. Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > Moose wrote: > >>It's all about the Image! > > > > I consider your particular choice in 3rd-party digital backs to > have an outstanding imaging system as well as a very decent AF > system. It's even quite responsive. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: The Pentax K10D, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: The Pentax K10D, ScottGee1 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: The Pentax K10D, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: The Pentax K10D - Now don't take the Moose out of context rant - and even more OT, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |