Subject: | [OM] Re: 'Cheap-o Zuiko? Or Leitz? |
---|---|
From: | ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:31:03 -0400 |
Interesting how "right" "wrong" can be sometimes . . . ScottGee1 On 9/20/06, Komtanoo Pinpimai <romerun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, those colorful images came from expired slides cross processed along > with my lightmeter-broken OM-1n. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: morning image, ScottGee1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: I ain't got my panties balled up about the e-400, yet . . ., Walt Wayman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 'Cheap-o Zuiko? Or Leitz?, Komtanoo Pinpimai |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 'Cheap-o Zuiko? Or Leitz?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |