Bill wrote:
> also implied that it will be a cheaper deal. As one who has a
> cramp in my trigger finger...
Boy, am I glad you slept in the other shelter!
> 2) Assuming Olympus doesn't announce a replacement for the
> e-1, my question is, "Which of the Can*n digital full frame
> bodies should a disappointed Olympus customer look at as
> either a transition body for moving to the Can*n system
> or to give them a full frame digital solution for their OM
> lenses."
That's why the petition idea won't work. The only thing any of
these morons understand is reduced market share. Product
managers and marketing managers think that only they know why
something is or isn't selling. Customer comments are almost
always ignored as "chatter in the peanut gallery". "I'm a
professional Marketing Manager, you're not!"
I'm with you, Bill. A third-party back for my Zuiko lenses just
might be in order. If the E-3 is introduced before I'm ready to
buy, then fine. If not, then I'm gone. Life is too short, and
I've been taking your comments about equipment relevance
seriously.
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|