Moose wrote:
> keith_w wrote:
>> For some reason my copy of Chuck's message (partially quoted above) is
>> missing. I must have dumped it or something, so I cannot look it up.
>>
>> My question is, "...a 15% improvement..." over what, please?
> He was doing the math on Winsor's comment:
>
> "I have seen at least one review by a very careful guy that seemed to
> indicate there is only a very small difference in image quality between a
> 12MP ND2X and a 16MP C1DsII, at least at reasonable ISOs."
>
> Moose
Ahhh, that's funny, as I was reading his formula and thinking he was talking
about a 4/3 system.
He had said (sqrt (16/12)) -1, as I recall, and 16/12 being 1.3333... which
is the same result of dividing 4 by 3, well, you can see how easily I misled
myself!
Hah, hah...Thanks, Moose.
keith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|