Subject: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read |
---|---|
From: | "Marc Lawrence" <mlawrence@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:45:47 +1000 |
> Philippe Le Zuikomane wrote: > Hand-punched. High quality, no unreliable machines. - Phil Does this mean that if I "recall" my punched card, and don't like the quality of the picture, I can claim it wasn't my fault - it was caused by hanging chads - and demand a recount? ;-) Cheers, Marc (Was that political?) Lawrence Sydney, Oz ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Marc Lawrence |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] What's up with Tokina?, usher99 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3, Marc Lawrence |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read, Philippe Le Zuikomane |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |