Subject: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:54:59 -0700 |
Philippe Le Zuikomane wrote: > I can't wait for a solution offering long-life photochemical archiving of > high-resolution digital pictures. - Phil > How about a return to punched paper tape? With archival paper and optical readers, they might outlast film. I know there are lots of paper piano rolls from getting on to a century ago that still work fine. Lets see now, how much paper to record 12 mp x three colors...... :-) Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Moon 9:05 - Now 18-180mm Mini review, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Two versions of the OM 2?, usher99 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] More or less, shooting digital vs film over a photography trip, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read, Manuel Viet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |