Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: EOS 400D

Subject: [OM] Re: EOS 400D
From: Nils Frohberg <nilsf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:01:54 +0200
(Disclaimer: I didn't look into C*non's new body, I don't care much.)

On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:43:19PM -0700, Moose wrote:
[C*non's SSWF]
> But I sure have to respect Canon.

To me, this move only  shows, again, that C*non's not willing/courageous
enough to  be innovative. Until  today, C*nonites were  always repeating
the  same  sermon: "Olympus'  SSWF? Hah! No need  for  that! It  doesn't
help  keeping  dust out,  ...etc..." Now  watch  them praise  their  new
achievement: SSWF.

It's the same in  every industry, the big guns pick  all the good things
that the little companies come up with, and the customers cheer. Yay.

-- 
The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (91% of Full)

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz