This brings up one little thing I found out about the E-1's mayer colour
filter inside the KAF sensor, which Kodak says is made from pigment colours.
I've just read the Jul/Aug edition of Digital PhotoPro and there was an
article comparing pigment with dye colour inks. The reason why I brought
this issue up is I'm trying to line it up with the case of comparing
built-in filters (as in the E-500) and external ring-type filters.
I'm wondering also whether there is any difference only in terms of
durability. I think that as far as visual differences, the margins might not
be that visible to most of our eyes....
On 01/09/06, Ali Shah <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Interesting that you mention filters. I have been
> wondering and havent had time to test. The E-500 has
> built-in filters but wouldnt it be better to
> physically attach a filter to the lens? Will the
> physical filter produce a better photo vs. built-in
> filters? I use a UV filter at all times but I am
> talking about Yellow, Orange, Red, etc filters.
>
> I took a couple of photo workshops through the local
> university and the guy who teaches the classes does
> not believe in filters.
Strange guy.
Particularly not UV/Skylight
> filters!
I know people who don't also.
However, I believe protecting the glass on
> the lens is far more important.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
Khen Lim
XIOS Network Solutions
IBM Business Partner
+60 +16 528 6010 / 016 528 6010
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|