Subject: | [OM] Re: Next E-x? |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT) |
khen wrote: > No, Winsor, no more. And in fact, Olympus did not > intentionally go into a no-dev mode during the OM days. I was > there. We were gobsmacked - stunned in fact - by how Minolta > was taken to the cleaners and back with Honeywell's... I'm gobsmacked with your post. You are filling in a whole bunch of blanks in the history of Olympus. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, khen lim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, Johann Thorsson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, khen lim |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Next E-x?, Tim Randles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |