Subject: | [OM] Re: new models? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:01:00 -0400 |
I don't see how. The way digital image stabilization works is to allow the image to float across the surface of a sensor somewhat larger than the image area and capture the image area wherever it happens to be. How you tell where the image is supposed to be I haven't a clue. Maybe accelerometers? Next has to do with the sensitivity of the sensor. As the image is skittering across the sensor surface eventually the shutter button is hit and it's time to capture. Is the sensor fast enough to do that? Let's use some hypothetical numbers. Assume a 9.3 MP E-3 sensor with 2700 x 3600 pixels. (nice round numbers, I just made it up). Using the 14-54 lens at 54 mm the image covers 19.1 degrees horizontally. If the camera is rocking horizontally at a rate of 10 degrees/second (another number I just made up... but it seem reasonable) then the image is skittering across the sensor at a rate of (10/19.1) x 3600 = 1884 pixels/second or 1.884 pixels per millisecond. Does this mean that stabilization only works at very high shutter speeds? Seems that that problem has already been solved by none other than high shutter speeds. What's wrong with this picture and my calculations? Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > Chuck Norcutt wrote: > >>Yes, digital image stabilization which is derived from >>camcorder technology and probably requires a real time >>image. I don't think that's likely for an E-x machine. > > > I'd love to be vindicated on this one. I wrote months and months > ago that I expected Olympus to go image-stabilization digitally > instead of mechanically. > > Yes, I'd buy it. Just give me 10+ MP. > > Nice thing about Olympus with the E-thingy pro line. You can > buy the next model and not worry about it getting obsoleted by > Olympus for at least three or four years. > > AG > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: digital image stabilization, Bill Pearce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: And Now For Something Completely Different -, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: new models?, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: new models?, tOM Trottier |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |