I may be wrong but I don't think the E-330 would meet the definition of
real time need for implementation of image stabilization.
Chuck Norcutt
Candace Lemarr wrote:
> OK, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but....if OLY already has a
> real time image on the 330, then why wouldn't image stabilization be an
> option for them with future digital E series cameras?
>
> Please use language I can understand...i.e., 3 year old language, LOL ;-))
> Candace
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:31 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: new models?
>
>
>
>>Yes, digital image stabilization which is derived from camcorder
>>technology and probably requires a real time image. I don't think
>>that's likely for an E-x machine.
>>
>>Also was a combination of CCD shift and high ISO (up to 1600). So,
>>maybe they bought something from Fukji and Minolta before KM had to
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|