> Moose wrote:
> I think that is almost certainly your browser. Probably adjustable
> somewhere in preferences where you can choose to have images
> too big for the display area either resized, probably with an
> option to maintain proportions, or displayed full size with scroll
> bars. Also, if you have an info/favorites/etc. bar on the side,
> you can temporarily close it - to give the image room to breathe
> (chuckle).
>
> It is absolutely dead simple, basic HTML and displays exactly
> the same here, full size, on Firefox, IE and Netscape browsers.
The webpage will likely display the same in any webbrowser. My point
is that the actual jpg itself has different dimensions to that which
you specify it to display as in the HTML source.
The image referenced in the HTML source is:
http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/Calif/Sierras/siltrees.jpg
The pixel dimensions of this image are 840x553.
Your HTML source, however, specifies the browser to display it as
follows:
<IMG SRC=siltrees.jpg width=860 height=660>
That is, 860x660, which are different dimensions to the jpg,
particarly as a ratio of each other, thus the horizontal compression
of the image in the webpage:
http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/Calif/Sierras/Siltrees.htm
It's a lovely image. I like the non-horizontally-compressed version
better though. :-)
Cheers,
Marc
Sydney, Oz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
