It's a 4000-ED.
Since the images I showed you were mid- to late-1950s, it has to be plain
Kodachrome, not even Kodachrome-II (ASA25) which came along in the early
1960s (with Kodachrome-X at ASA64). What speed was plain Kodachrome? I
don't know, but K-II was supposed to be faster!
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: 21 August 2006 23:24
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Moose's Review Site
Any comment about the efficacy of FARE on Kodachrome? K64 in particular
since almost all of my old slides are K64 and a fair number have been
infected with mold from improper storage many years ago. Piers showed that
his Nikon film scanner (model ?) did a pretty good job on both dust and mold
on Kodachrome (25?)
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
>
> - Canon's FARE dust removal seems to be just as good as ICE, but much
> faster. Over 12 slides or up to 30 neg frames at once and what's left
> of my lifetime, that's adds up to quite a few days difference. I don't
> have to be there paying attention, but still...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|