Ah, this is more better. I didn't think Moose would compare apples and
oranges when Red Delicous and crab apples were available.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>>The appearance to me was that 200 ISO on the 5D was being compared to
>>800 ISO on the 300D. The was amplified by seeing the noise in the 300D
>>image. Am I wrong?
>>
>
> Aaaaahh, the light dawns in my fuzzy head! I didn't understand your
> question before.
>
> You are indeed wrong. Each apparent image is a separate roll-over, with
> the 5D image as default in each case, and the 300D image shown when the
> mouse is rolled over the images.
>
> Both images in the top roll-over were taken at iso 800. Both images in
> the bottom roll-over were taken at iso 200.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|