Very, very nice but strikes me as just a tad too bright... at least on
my monitor.
Chuck Norcutt
Mostly wrote:
> OK, here's my entry.
>
> http://www.davebulger.com/proof/lotus1.jpg
>
> Hardly a spectacular shot, but helped considerably by the bee that chose to
> visit. The fact that it's the only lily-pad related shot I have also helps.
> :)
>
> I'd print it up & sell it for big bucks, but I can't get the guy to sign a
> release. Says he's been stung before...
>
> OM-4 & Zuiko 90/2
> RDPIII probably shot at ISO80
> Looked for metadata on the film for exposure information, but couldn't find
> any... :)
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Hmm - Maybe it's time to dust of the polarizer...
> Lovely stuff
> jez
>
> On 8/19/06, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>As long as you slipped in a non Oly lily pad, you might enjoy this. The
>>other lily and pad pics recently posted show only the surface of the
>>water. This one shows both some reflections and the underwater detail of
>>the plant
>
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/GGPark/Flowers/pages/FL36.htm>.
>
>>I like the seeing through the barrier of the water surface quality. It's
>>followed by a close-up of the right bloom and reflection, then a couple
>>more lily blossoms.
>>
>>Moose
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
