I've got the Sigma 50-200. It gives you a cheap 50-200mm lens. Everything is
very plastic about it, and I feel like risking to destroy the focusing
mechanics when putting on the hood. And the hood is known to shade the
sensor on bigger formats then 4/3 btw. But it was in my price range, I
needed the 200mm bad. Now I'm saving my my money for the DZ 35-100 or DZ
7-14 instead...
I'm happy with it, but not satisfied.
And I did go with the FL-36 instead of the FL-50. And I'm satisfied with
that.
/ Johan
Den 06-08-13 18.56, skrev "Paul Braun" <cygnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Apparently I wasn't specific enough in my previous posting's subject line...
>
> I'm planning on picking up the Sigma 50-200 and an FL50. I'm looking on
> the 'Bay right now, and see some good options on the lens (47th St.) -
> any experiences one way or the other?
>
> Essentially, looking for the best combination of customer service/price
> on these two items. And probably the extended battery grip as well for
> the E1.
>
> Thanks.
--
OM-gear for sale! Please visit http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/?dnode=1176
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|