Hi Christos,
It's the Olympus OM 50/2 Macro, definitely my favourite lens.
I'm not a flash lover, so I always try not to use flashes although they can
be necessary in some circumstances.
Those are negative scans, just sharpened a bit (the saturation, if I recall
correctly, hasn't been increased in post-processing): the final prints show
better details in the highlights, though.
Ciao
Fabio
On 8/6/06, Christos Stavrou <christos.stavrou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I really like the painterly effect and saturated colour, whereas the
> very good definition adds to the sense of three dimensions. Which lens
> is this, the OM 50/2 or the new digital 50mm?
>
> One suggestion about the macro work here, though might not matter. It
> seems that a diffuser would help with the control of highlights.
>
> regards
> Christos
>
> On 8/6/06, Fabio Fiorellato <flowerside@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > That, IMHO, explain why this lens deserves all the praises it gets...
> >
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/flowerside/tags/macro/
> >
> > Some of the pears' shots have been enlarged to 10''x15'' without loosing
> > anything in detail or sharpness...
> >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Fabio
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|