I've been thinking about ordering one of these but it wouldn't help in
your case with such slow lenses:
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=402221&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
ps: Is the 50-250 parfocal? Can you focus first at the long end and
then shorten it up and stay in focus?
Chuck Norcutt
Jeff Keller wrote:
> Thanks to a tip from Scott, I picked up a "Brightscreen" for my 5D for ~$40
> (Thank you Scott!). After using it for a week in a slightly too warm
> tropical climate with some slow lenses I have doubts that it is better than
> the original plain screen.
>
> Before leaving on vacation I took some shots of my daughter using a 450/4.5
> cat lens inside my house at night. The split image seemed to work. I left
> the screen in my camera when I went on a vacation trip.
>
> While on vacation I found the 50-250/5 Zuiko quite hard to focus at the
> short end. I also found the 350/5.6 cat lens would not give a completly
> illuminated split image. The split image circle plus microprism donut in the
> bright screen is quite large. When it darkens a big portion of the image
> can't be used to judge focus.
>
> Overall I would say a 1-13 screen in an OM works better for slow lenses than
> the Brightscreen. If you are using lenses faster than about f4 and have
> sharp contrast lines in the view to take advantage of the split image then
> the Brightscreen would probably be better than the original plain screen.
> I'm hoping to find time to carefully compare the Brightscreen to the
> original screen but I suspect that I will go back to the original screen.
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|