I think the sensors in the new F series are special, but Fuji does
use a lot of clever post processing. One guy on the Fuji dpreview
forum put up a raw shot that was just converted from his E900 and the
noise was awesomely bad while the jpegs, while not as good at high
ISO as the F series, is pretty good.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jul 2, 2006, at 7:02 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> The noise in the 300D image is a bit amazing. Also the exposure
> differences. Particularly noticeable to me in the camera body in the
> ISO 400 images. DPReview has always claimed that Canon sensors are
> 1/3
> stop more sensitive than the ISO rating would inidate what what I see
> looks like more than 1/3 stop difference between the two cameras. Are
> we seeing the full frame or a cropped section? Is the Fuji doing a
> lot
> of noise reduction that would be recognizable by lost detail at high
> magnification?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|