Yeah, what Fernando said. I thought it was the OM-2 that had "shock
absorbers". I remember the ads making a bid deal about it. The shocks
were supposed to be what allowed getting rid of the mirror lockup on the
OM-2. (ha, ha).
Chuck Norcutt
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Hi Russ and John, and all here in the List
>
> There's something I don't grasp here.
> Is there a design difference between both models that would prevent the 2n
> failing like the 1n was supposed to fail?
>
> TIA,
>
> Fernando.
>
>
> on 26/06/2006 20:35, Russ Butler at russ@xxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
>
>
>>1. selected 1n vs 2n
>
>
> on 27/06/2006 09:24, John Hermanson at omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
>
>
>>Sounds like you may have worn out shocks in the mirror mechanism, which
>>can prevent mirror latching. In this case, when the shutter is wound,
>>mirror just goes up.
>
> [snip]
>
>>Get the OM-2 out and don't think about it.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|