I tend to agree. Being an ol' farm boy raised amongst and tending to a herd of
over 250 polled Herefords, I was far more interested in and distracted by the
mysterious foreground, trying to figure out if the darker objects were a cow or
two or, as it now appears, a feed rack and a hay wagon. I think either lighter
or darker would be more better. The sky's gaudy, but I kinda like gaudy
sometimes.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Nice but I have difficulty with the foreground. I think it should be
> either darker or lighter. As it is, the barely visible foreground
> details keep drawing my attention from the sky and I'm straining to see
> what's there. I suggest that you either make it darker such that I
> can't see much of any detail or else bring the foreground brightness up
> a bit so I don't have to strain to see what's there.
>
> The sky might also benefit from being less saturated and a bit more real
> looking but that I can't say for sure.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Guillaume Remy wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Being mainly a lurker on this list, I'm submitting today my first pic !
> > http://homeusers.brutele.be/guillaumme_remy/_tmp/index.html
> > Taken with OM4, Tamron 28/2.5 on Fuji Sensia 200, this is the result from a
> Moose-like treatment
> > from 2 different exposures...
> > Any comments welcome...
> >
> > Guillaume
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|