At 12:10 AM 6/9/2006, AG Schnozz wrote:
>The biggest problem with 4/3 is the DoF. Right? RIGHT?
>
>Come on, admit it, you've been worried that the cropped format
>of 4/3 means that macro is garbage. Well.... Maybe. Maybe not.
Hi Ken,
I was under the impression that one of the
features/consequences/whatever of the small sensor was that it gave
increased depth of field (in the order of twice the depth of field as
a 35mm film camera) which should be an advantage when doing macro
work and would only be a disadvantage when you wanted extremely
shallow depth of field for something like portrait work. Would you
mind pointing me to some reading material of a technical nature that
discusses what makes the 4/3s format unsuitable for macro?
Thanks,
Johnny
__________________________
Johnny Johnson
Cleveland, GA
mailto:jjohnso4@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|