Op 7-jun-06 om 23:31 heeft AG Schnozz het volgende geschreven:
>> I'd give up the 35-80/2.8 or the 90/2 before I'd let go the
>> 100/2. I feel pretty much the same way about the 135/4.5,
>> too.
>
> I've had the opportunity to use a 100/2 under the watchful eye
> of its owner. If Joel hovered any closer the lens would have
> fogged. ;)
>
> Anyway, I will admit that it's a very sweet hunk-o-glass. Very
> sweet indeed. However, the controls were switched around and I
> felt like I was using a Nikkor. It looked REALLY good on my E-1
> and I shot a few comparison shots, but strangely enough, it
> wasn't comfortable to me. Maybe it was the nervous owner
> nearby, maybe it was the knowledge that it cost more than almost
> my entire kit. Regardless of what it was, I happily returned to
> my 100/2.8.
That is very strange, wasn't it the 90f2 with the switched controls?
That's why I sold my 90f2 for the 100f2.
The controls are "normal" albeit a bit bigger. And it has a silly hood
built in...
>
> There is a part of me--the retrogrouch--that would pick up an
> OM-3Ti and a few of these deeeelux F2 lenses and kiss off
> digital. It sure would make weeklong back-country expeditions a
> whole lot easier than the nightmare of digital in the field.
> Hey, I've got an outstanding film scanner--what more do I need?
>
> AG
A 3Ti, MD2 and an 100f2, haha!
Iwert.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|