Ken
I don't normally examine shots like that, so it was a bit of a test,
especially at this time of the morning. However, I notice that the
centre square is a little softer at the extremes of aperture (largest
and smallest) than the middle settings.
It looks pretty good to me; what else should I notice? :-)
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 29 May 2006, at 00:48, AG Schnozz wrote:
> www.image66media.com
>
> Go to the Gallery.
>
> I have refrained from making any comments about what I think is
> best. I'll let you all make your own decisions.
>
> You may be wondering why XP2 Super was used instead of a finer
> grained film. This is about the only film I'm using anymore and
> this test was to determine "real-world" capabilities. I used my
> common settings and let both the camera and the scanner work in
> "auto mode". I could have used Velvia, but the resolution
> increase over XP2 is minimal and offset by lateral halation.
>
> If you click on the mid-size image (800 pixel width), you'll see
> the cropped 100% pixel version of that specific image. The 100%
> pixel images (except for the full-frame shots) are saved at 100%
> quality.
>
> All images scanned at 4000dpi on the Nikon Coolscan V-ED, using
> the latest version of Viewscan. No sharpening or noise-reduction
> applied. The high-grain factor is more a result of the automated
> single-pass batch scanning.
>
> ken
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|