Oooh! Very nice. These would have been real keepers with an
uncluttered background. I'm surprised at the DOF of #2. Deeper than I
would have expected and it works very well.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> It's been rainy the last couple of days, with clouds low enough to make
> it foggy here.
>
> So I shot some irises sitting in a vase. Just test shots so the
> backgrounds aren't right, but I think the flowers came out quite well
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/CAirises/>.
>
> At first, I was having a terrible time with the shots in the RAW
> converter and PS, Didn't look right, couldn't seem to fix them. Then I
> thought "Doh!", may have slapped my head, and ran in to take a shot of
> the WhiBal in it in the same light. Presto, click on the gray in the
> converter, process the others with the same setting, and suddenly
> everything it great. The lighting was an odd mix of tungsten, those bulb
> replacement florescents behind opal glass and a little gray outdoor light.
>
> Yeah, I know, the E-1 would have nailed the WB without help. :-)
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|