One of my watershed moments in being skeptical of digital was a
beautiful 8X10 portrait taken with a 1.3MP point and shoot. It was
then that I realized that all of the arguments using math, counting
pixels, and not looking were a crock.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On May 16, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I've got a 24x36 portrait shot with a 3MP D30. Looks, mighty, mighty
> good to me.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Jeff Keller wrote:
>
>> Thanks for posting this. I read the outbackphoto.com (linked to in
>> this
>> page) web page a month or so ago. It seemed to claim the 39MP P45
>> back was
>> comparable to a 4x5 Velvia transparency. Dividing 39MP by (4 x 5)/
>> (1 x 1.5)
>> implies a 3MP digital is comparable to an OM shooting Velvia.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|