Russ Butler wrote:
> Here, for your (possible) viewing pleasure, are some shots from winter
> at home in NJ and a car trip to the west coast and back this spring. All
> were taken with an OM-1n and Tamron 28-200 171A except a 50/1.4 for the
> portrait. I took other lenses along but never used them. (too lazy &/or
> impatient). Fuji 400 film & scans from Costco (cheap). Clearly, attempts
> at photography expose my character flaws :-)
>
Seems to me in this case it's mostly cheap scans that expose flaws. I
think there are some terrific shots here, with interesting subjects and
strong composition, hiding behind poor scans and/or post processing.
I hope you don't mind; I took the liberty of doing quick touch-ups of
most of them, just to show what's hiding under the very flat scans
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/RussButler/index.htm>.
Russ Butler wrote:
> Christos Stavrou wrote:
>
> There are some great compositions here...
> (see for example: winter in NJ (the 1st), late March in AZ, Chinle, White
> Sands, driving across )
>
And a couple of others.
>> I especially like the monochromatic approach and restricted pallette of
>> colours complimented by some minimalist approach of abstraction. An emphasis
>> on shapes and space but avoiding extreme stylisation. The common
>> characteristic, that I perceive with pleasure, is the search for expression,
>> for a way to communicate the personal experience and subjective emotion.
>>
> Thank you very much for your kind words and taking the time to look at
> the pictures. I was puzzled by your comment "monochromatic approach and
> restricted pallette of colours" as that wasn't my conscious intention.
> Then I looked them over and you are of course right, there's very little
> color in most. I guess that pleased me when I selected the samples.
>
I generally prefer them with a little contrast, which also picks up the
color. I didn't add any saturation. In the first, I only added a little
local contrast enhancement. In the last one, I could make an argument
for either the original or my version. I tend to go as far as I can when
doing something like this, to see what's there to work with. In some
cases, if they were my images my final version would probably be
somewhere in between. In one like the Grand Canyon, I'd stick with the
altered version.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|