Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like it would be worth re-doing the page
with the intent of making it permanent. It was a quick after work project
that I had promised a friend but was very slow to deliver on. (It's been
there quite awhile, the recent discussion reminded me of it)
It looks like I missed the focus on the pin ... a lot of pixels for a fuzzy
image. But he got his tripod adapter fixed up for his 80-200/2.8 that's what
really counts.
-jeff
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Ian Nichols" <ian.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
That's because they're actually 2560x1920 (I tried saving one and loading
the saved file into a viewer).
A small version that links to the full size pic would probably be a better
strategy.
Thanks anyway to Jeff for posting those, which I missed the first time -
must have been while I was unsubbed.
On 04/04/06, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> By the way, Jeff, the jpegs on your excellent page about the mounts are
> way too big, 1.5 mb for 512x384 pixels. Something like 100K would be
> plenty.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|