You don't have to be old to prefer reading on paper to screens. Lots of
us younger folk feel the same way. I use the excuse that it's quicker &
easier to understand being able to view about 100 lines without having
to scroll backwards & forwards ( not to mention the occasional left to
right :-( ) across 20 lines on the screen.
Anyway, computers were supposed to do away with paper, yet the reverse
happened & won't change for a long time :-) .
David
Walt Wayman wrote:
>Thanks for all the advice and suggestions, folks. Since I retired, I don't
>have a lot of use for the two laser printers and lifetime supply of paper and
>toner I had left, so I print stuff at the drop of a hat and have printed
>nearly all your responses. Being an old-timey fart, I seem to comprehend what
>I read on paper better than on screen, so I'm going to peruse and ponder,
>probably with highlighter in hand, and see what I come up with. I know
>already there'll be no RAID and two DIMMs instead of four and that if I buy
>from Dell, it'll be from the Small Business division, where the three Dells
>presently in house all came from.
>
>Thanks again, y'all.
>
>Walt
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from
>the car just isn't photogenic." --
>Edward Weston
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|