Oh no....what have you found?
On 24 Mar 2006 at 20:36, Scott Gomez wrote:
I've got one of the useless, foggy rear-element Zuiko zooms as well. It
has always taken nice shots, also, so I suppose I didn't strictly need
to spend the money on the DZ.
Nonetheless, I'm undismayed by your post, Walt.
Buying the 50-200 is part of my insidious plan to have spent my
children's potential inheritance down to a pittance before I die. :-)
---
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Walt Wayman
Subject: [OM] Re: A lens to supplement my 50mm/1.8 Zuiko
Some of you, particularly those who may have just spent big bucks on a
50-200DZ lens, may not want to read further here. I am still a bit
discombobulated by what I have found. I'm sure I'll get over it, but
this is all still quite surprising.
Walt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|