Subject: | [OM] Re: Epson V700 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:56:10 -0500 |
But the Epson image is generally brighter which may account for the bright spot on the fingernail. Chuck Norcutt swisspace wrote: > The highlights seem to more blown out with the epson scan, it was > scanned at 24bit but I don't think the Dmax is quite equal to the > Nikon's but for me the advantages of this scanner far outweigh the > disadvantages. > > IanW > > Chuck Norcutt wrote: > >>Not much difference that I can see except that I like the Epson color >>rendition better. >> >>Chuck Norcutt >> >>swisspace wrote: >> >> >>>Sorry, the first link (nikon coolscan V) should have been this >>> >>>http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/60002766-M.jpg >>> >>>The second for the V700 epson was correct >>> >>>http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/60002768-M.jpg >>> >>>IanW >> >> >> >>============================================== >>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com >>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx >>============================================== >> > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Canon plastic skin, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Canon plastic skin, ScottGee1 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Epson V700, swisspace |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Epson V700, Duncan Paterson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |