I will add my dittos to that. No dirty sensor problem either and I
think the frequency for me has been about the same. The newer Nikons
have a feature that let you take a shot of a blank sheet of paper and
you can set the software to automatically map out any spots in post
processing like that digital ICE for scanners. So you could, I
suppose, never clean it.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Moose wrote:
> NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Dirty sensors are a way of life (an expensive one) for people who
>> use the other two.
>>
>>
> This is not a pitch for other brands. In fact, if answers to a
> couple of
> questions are affirmative, I will almost certainly buy an E-330.
>
> However, as a matter of truth in advertising, cleaning sensors is just
> not hard or tricky. It is, however, in the interest of those who
> service
> cameras to have users believe it to be dangerous.
>
> And as Winsor has chipped in about his Nik*n, my Can*n has had
> essentially no dirty sensor problem. I've cleaned it lightly once
> so far
> in a year and a half or so. It had a couple of spots that showed up
> slightly in rare shots.
> Moose
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|